Governance software tells you what happened after the fact. GRACI surfaces the gap before the work gets called done.
Enterprise legal teams and their outside counsel already spend $30M+ per company. Only 2% of that spend is software — and 95% of AI deployments never reach production because continuous ownership and verification are missing.
Ciph Lab is building the continuous ownership layer that makes high-stakes AI work production-ready — across legal documents, client matters, and the AI tools now touching both. We start where spend and risk collide hardest: IP.
Or take the free IR™ Readiness Score →Every document — policy or client matter — and every AI tool deployment carries its own ownership requirements. Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed, Governance, and Verification become live conditions. Empty means blocked. Named means cleared.
This is not another static RACI chart. Ownership lives on the document itself — turning previously ungovernable AI legal work into production-ready, auditable output.
Category Shift: GRC tools log what happened after the fact. GRACI flags missing ownership at the point of work — before it becomes a compliance finding.
Most governance platforms are built for compliance teams to review after the fact. GRACI is built into the point of work itself — for the people actually producing the document or deploying the tool.
Stress-tested, not theoretical: GRACI was built and stress-tested against real-world regulatory filing workflows, then independently applied to a live enterprise AI deployment via our Phase 0 diagnostic — surfacing a quantified governance gap (Phase 0 score: 23/48) that existed on paper but wasn't enforced in practice.
A policy is updated by one team but never reaches the group still working from the old version. A client file moves from associate to paralegal to partner — and no single record shows who is accountable for what is still outstanding. The same gap now exists when AI tools generate or edit those documents, or when an AI tool is deployed enterprise-wide with no one verifying who's using it and how.
The result is rarely a dramatic failure. It is constant and expensive: version drift, missed sign-offs, and the quiet erosion of ownership across firm policies, client matters, and enterprise AI tools alike.
Consistently reviewed and traceable, so the version everyone's working from is always the right one — with a clear record of who approved what, and when.
Know who's responsible for what, at every stage of a matter — without relying on institutional memory or a scattered email trail.
From enterprise chatbot rollouts to regulated filings — know who governs which tool, and who verifies its output before it becomes a decision.
"I didn't study this market from the outside — I lived it from the inside."
The same structural gap now sits at the center of enterprise legal work — only with higher professional responsibility, privilege risk, and client stakes.
We're seeking a small number of design partners — IP groups and enterprise Legal Ops teams — to help shape the commercial platform before it's fully built.
Enterprise legal departments already spend ~$30M per company, yet only 2% of that spend is software. At the same time, 95% of AI deployments never reach production because continuous ownership and verification are missing.
Ciph Lab is building the continuous ownership layer that turns this gap into production-ready infrastructure for high-stakes legal and AI-governed work. We start in IP — where outside counsel spend, AI experimentation, and privilege risk collide hardest — then expand into full Enterprise Legal Ops and Corporate Risk.
The same platform becomes the governance standard enterprises require of their outside counsel.